SHKENCE

Shkencëtarët: Intelegjenca e njeriut në rënie

Keni menduar se me çfarë rrethi shoqëror jeni të rrethuar?

Studimet e fundit nga Universiteti i Stanfordit japin një përgjigje, dhe lajm i keq këtu është se gjërat nuk kanë të ngjarë të marrin ndonjë të mirë.

Dr. Gerald Crabtree, një gjenetist në Stanford, ka bërë një studim i cili bënë përpjekje të identifikojë përparimin e inteligjencës së njeriut modern.

Sipas hulumtimit të tij, të botuar në dy pjesë duke filluar me 'intelektin tonë të brishtë të viteve të kaluara', Crabtree mendon se ndryshimet e pashmangshme në gjenetik së bashku me përparimet teknologjike moderne i kanë bërë njerëzit të duken të marrë.

Ai së fundmi ka publikuar analizën e tij të quajtur "follow-up" e cila shpjegon se nga gjithsejt 5.000 gjeneve që konsiderohen si bazë për inteligjencën njerëzore, një numër i mutacioneve gjatë viteve ka detyruar njeriun modern të jetë vetëm një pjesë aq e ndritshme si paraardhësit e tij.

"Zhvillimet e reja të gjenetikës, antropologjisë dhe Neurobiologjis parashikojnë se një numër shumë i madh i gjeneve nënvizojnë aftësitë tona intelektuale dhe emocionale, duke i bërë këto aftësi gjenetikisht dhe çuditërisht të brishta," shkruan ai në pjesën e parë të kërkimit të tij.

Nga atje, mjeku vazhdon të shpjegojë se mutacionet e përgjithshme gjatë disa mija viteve të fundit kanë lënë njerëzit gjithnjë e më të paaftë për të përballuar situata të caktuara që ndoshta paraardhësit tanë do të ishin përshtatur më mirë.

Sipas mjekut, njerëzit ishin në shumicën e tyre inteligjente kur "çdo individ ishte i ekspozuar ndaj mekanizmave para natyrës selektive në baza ditore."

Në këto kushte, përshtatje, ai argumentoi se ishte më shumë një çështje 'lufte ose fluturimi’

"Ne, si një specie jemi çuditërisht të brishta intelektualisht dhe ndoshta arritëm kulmin 2,000 deri në 6,000 vjet më parë" shton me tutje ai.

Kjo nuk do të thotë se e gjitha është duke shkuar drejt greminës. Dr Crabtree thotë se, "edhe pse Gjenomet tona janë të brishta, shoqëria jonë është e fuqishme pothuajse tërësisht për shkak të edukimit, i cili ’’shpërndahet me shpejtësi të madhe në një shoqëri".

"Njerëzit 300 vjet më parë nuk kishin asnjë ide se ku do të jemi ne shkencërisht tani" thotë ai, duke shtuar se ne do të jemi në gjendje të merremi me këtë problem me një gamë të zgjidhjeve humane dhe etike.

The study of the quantum universe shows us that time does not exist. It shows us that time is a function of relativity only and exists relative to some arbitrary point of reference.

Quantum Theory and non-locality goes something like this; Take two particles, A and B (photons or electrons for example). Pair them, then separate them, and put them on either side of the planet. Stimulate particle A, and particle B will react without any time delay.

In other words both particles act at the same moment in time regardless of distance. This is remarkable right, how can this be? We need to have a physical connection, we need to observe some kind of interconnecting frequency waveform or something, right? This also means we’ve got an interaction between particles happening way beyond the speed of light, right? No I don’t understand this to be accurate.

Quantum Theory Proves That Time Does Not Exist, at the fundamental level in any case. It shows that our concept of time, as thought of as a linear passage of events is totally wide of the mark, in fact there is no mark. Everything exists in an ever present moment. The seeming connection that science is trying to identify is actually consciousness itself. It is that which we are, or at least it is a rudimentary form of that which we are. Time does not actually exist and Quantum Theory proves it.

In science, a “bit” of information is said to have two possible answers. This view of things, i.e everything is either A or B, is inaccurate. Actual reality has an infinite number of answers or possibilities, it has any number of possible outcomes. The future does not exist until we create it. We are the factor, the parameter that decides the outcome whether our conscious mind realises it or not. We can not isolate ourselves from the the universe, we form part of the equation, always.

Mechanics Or Ecology?

The word “Mechanics” used in the term “Quantum Mechanics” indicates a machine like predictable, buildable, knowable thing. The Quantum Universe in which we live, whether we want to accept it or not, may seem on the surface to be mechanical and linear but it is not. It is probably better described as an infinite multitude of possible linear actions. If we must give this still mystical process a name lets call it “Quantum Ecology” rather than “Quantum Mechanics” because it is built from within it’s self. Everything comes out of the invisible in the same way as any living organism does.

Quantum Computer

Currently there is a drive by science to create a functionalQuantum Computer. A Quantum Computer is a computation device that makes direct use of quantum mechanical phenomena, such as superposition andentanglement, to perform operations on data. Quantum computers are different from traditional digital computers. Digital computers require data to be encoded into binary digits (bits), quantum computation uses quantum properties to represent data and perform operations on these data. The reality is we already have millions of quantum computers- YOU & ME! If the scientists took the time to meditate they could have access to the infinitely humongous quantum computer that sits waiting for them.

Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.- Niels Bohr

Scientific Understanding is Flawed

The current predominant world paradigm is that if a thing can not be explained, detailed, analysed and documented by linear scientific thought processes then it’s mumbo jumbo. If you have a spiritual explanation for human existence then you’re crazy, you’re in dream land. The scientific mindset says everything in the universe must be capable of explanation either now or at some point in the future by scientific analytic methods alone. Science says “In the absence of scientific proof it’s not worth the time discussing. If it can not be put in a box with a label then forget it. Go figure out what box you can put it in, label it, then come back to us and we’ll see if we agree”. Can you see the limitations that this puts on human development?

Quantum particle behavior can not be explained in terms of science alone, that is to say, it can not be explained in terms of the mind because the mind by it’s nature functions on the basis that reality consists of things, things that can be broken down into individual bits of information and explained in a linear mechanical fashion. To realise how flawed this mindset is you must first accept that this is a relative world in which we live and on the conscious level we interact with other human beings and the rest of the universe in a linear fashion. This is the nature of the mind. We must go beyond the mind to access the answers.

World Challenges

The reality is the universe in not linear, fundamentally. It only seems to be from our current perspective. By “our current perspective” I mean our physical existence. Science is quite literally wasting it’s “time” by this continued search for what we are, under the linear terms that the sciences work. I recognise that science is incredibly valuable to us and has provided the basis for all the technology in the world, but is this how we are to measure success as human beings on this planet, by our technological advances? I don’t think so. To expect to solve world issues by means of science and linear thought is not only shortsighted, it is foolish and idiotic.

Source: www.wokenmind.com